CP studies assess advantages of flexible AFOs for children
The flexibility of an ankle foot orthosis (AFO) does not necessarily affect walking economy in children with cerebral palsy (CP), but more flexible AFOs may be particularly beneficial for sports activities in higher-performing children with CP, according to research presented in June at the 2015 ISPO Congress.
By Jordana Bieze Foster, Lower Extremity Review July 2015
In children with spastic CP and excessive knee flexion during stance, improvement in gait efficiency achieved with AFOs has more to do with kinematic changes than push-off power, Dutch researchers found.
Investigators from Vrije University Medical Center in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, assessed 14 children (mean age 10 ± 2 years) with spastic CP and excessive knee flexion during stance as they walked while wearing shoes only and under three different AFO conditions.
One condition involved wearing a rigid ventral-shell AFO, while the other two conditions involved a spring-hinged ventral-shell AFO, a design concept that has been reported to improve ankle push-off power and improved walking economy in adults (see Finding a formula for the optimal AFO in Lower Extremity Review). The spring-hinged AFO, which allowed 20° to 35° of ankle dorsiflexion, was tested under two stiffness settings, with either a stiff spring or a flexible spring. The children were allowed four weeks to accommodate to each AFO condition before gait analysis was performed.
“We expected that there would be a trade-off between improving knee angle and knee moment during stance and improving push-off power,” said Yvette Kerkum, MSc, a doctoral student in the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine at the university, who presented the findings at the congress.
All three AFO conditions significantly improved knee angle and knee moment compared to the shoes-only condition, and there were no significant differences between the AFOs for those variables. The rigid AFO was associated with significantly less ankle push-off power than shoes alone, but the two spring-hinged AFO conditions preserved it.
All three AFO conditions were associated with significantly lower net energy cost than shoes only, and, surprisingly, there were no significant differences between conditions. Effects were variable, in that some children were more efficient while wearing stiffer devices and others were more efficient with more flexible devices.
“The biomechanical differences between the devices were not necessarily reflected in the gait efficiency,” Kerkum said. “In children with cerebral palsy and excess knee flexion, improvement in gait may be defined more by kinematics and less by push-off power.”
The benefits of flexible AFOs, however, may be more apparent in children with high-level gross motor skills, according to research from McMaster University Children’s Hospital and Advanced Orthodynamics in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
The study included seven children with CP and one with sacral myelomeningocele (age range 7-14 years), all functioning at Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I or II, all of whom were unilateral users of molded plastic AFOs at the time of enrollment. Each child was provided a prefabricated dynamic-response carbon-fiber AFO and given one month to accommodate to the device.
Compared with a barefoot condition, both types of AFOs were associated with significant improvement on a six-minute walk test (6MWT), shuttle run, and Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) dimension E (walking, running, jumping); the dynamic-response AFO was also associated with significant improvement in jumping distance. The children’s scores were significantly better in the dynamic-response AFOs than the plastic AFOs for jumping and GMFM-E. Six of the eight children and/or their parents said they preferred the dynamic-response device.
“The dynamic-response carbon-fiber AFO has the potential to provide enhanced performance of high level gross motor skills that are the components of sports and fitness,” said Eric Bapty, CO(C), an orthotist at Advanced Orthodynamics, who presented the findings.
Source Lower Extremity Review
References |
The Effects of Varying Ankle Foot Orthosis Stiffness on Gait in Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy Who Walk with Excessive Knee Flexion, Kerkum YL, Buizer AI, van den Noort JC, Becher JG, Harlaar J, Brehm MA. PLoS One. 2015 Nov 23;10(11):e0142878. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142878. eCollection 2015.
Further reading |
Ankle-foot orthoses in children with cerebral palsy: a cross sectional population based study of 2200 children, Wingstrand M, Hägglund G, Rodby-Bousquet E. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Oct 2;15:327. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-327. Full text, PDF
Defining the mechanical properties of a spring-hinged ankle foot orthosis to assess its potential use in children with spastic cerebral palsy, Kerkum YL, Brehm MA, Buizer AI, van den Noort JC, Becher JG, Harlaar J. J Appl Biomech. 2014 Dec;30(6):728-31. doi: 10.1123/jab.2014-0046. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
The Efficacy of Ankle-Foot Orthoses on Improving the Gait of Children With Diplegic Cerebral Palsy: A Multiple Outcome Analysis, Ries AJ, Novacheck TF, Schwartz MH. PM R. 2015 Sep;7(9):922-929. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
Long-Term Effects of Orthoses Use on the Changes of Foot and Ankle Joint Motions of Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy, Liu XC, Embrey D, Tassone C, Zvara K, Brandsma B, Lyon R, Goodfriend K, Tarima S, Thometz J. PM R. 2018 Mar;10(3):269-275. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.08.438. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
Improved motor function in a pre-ambulatory child with spastic bilateral cerebral palsy, using a custom rigid ankle-foot orthosis-footwear combination: A case report, Young J, Jackson S. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2019 Aug;43(4):453-458. doi: 10.1177/0309364619852239. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
Efficacy of prefabricated carbon-composite ankle foot orthoses for children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy exhibiting a drop foot pattern, Altschuck N, Bauer C, Nehring I, Böhm H, Jakobeit M, Schröder AS, Mall V, Jung NH. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2019;12(2):171-180. doi: 10.3233/PRM-170524.
Principles of Ankle-Foot Orthosis Prescription in Ambulatory Bilateral Cerebral Palsy, Wright E, DiBello SA. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2020 Feb;31(1):69-89. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2019.09.007.