Science and sociology of footwear

The design and construction of footwear is constantly evolving in order to maximise its role of providing protection for the external environment, accommodate bony and soft tissue problems and assist in the biomechanical function of the foot, ankle and lower limb. The drive for this is evident in the papers in this issue that demonstrate how footwear contributes to foot pathology, [1] pain, [2] ulcers, and falls. [3]

Anita Williams PhD, Associate Editor, Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 14 September 2018

Hence, we are pleased to present in the Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, a broad range topics related to footwear that are highly relevant to clinical practice, the manufacturers of footwear and to future research directions. The call for papers for this themed issue has resulted in 5 new articles and 8 published articles which cover the wide ranging aspects of footwear.

Appropriate footwear is vital to maximising the potential for good foot health throughout a person’s life. However, footwear choices are dependent on many influencing factors such as underlying pathology/symptoms, gender, work and social demands to name a few, [5] lupus, [6] diabetes, [7] and neuromuscular conditions that include stroke and Parkinson. [8] The direct effect of pathological process and the resultant changes in the feet mean that people with long term foot conditions experience high levels of foot pain, impairment and disability.

A large proportion of the population wear incorrectly sized footwear, which is associated with foot pain and foot disorders. Greater emphasis should be placed on footwear fitting education and the provision of an appropriately large selection of shoes that can accommodate the variation in foot morphology among the population, particularly in relation to foot width. [1]

These problems can be compounded by the use of inappropriate footwear. Indeed, this issue emphasises that people with long term foot conditions frequently wear footwear which is ill-fitting and this is either due to it being an inappropriate design at the point of purchase or that the use over time has resulted in effective design components becoming ineffective. [3] Our increased understanding of factors related to footwear in different populations and in different contexts have provided the basis for how these problems may be solved through the evolution of footwear design and how patients are supported with information on appropriate footwear for various activities including work.

The footwear worn in the workplace is often not the footwear that we see in the clinical setting and, hence, insight into the impact of footwear worn in the work environment may aid diagnosis of foot and lower limb problems and inform management plans. Hence, footwear issues of fit and comfort in workers who stand for long periods of time are covered in this issue. [9] Slips, trips and falls in an occupational setting are considered to be key incidents that account for lower limb injury and consequently lost time and days lost. The identification of occupational risk factors and the solutions are multi-faceted with footwear being a key component in these incidents.

Paediatric footwear is an aspect that is under investigation in relation to the perceived and potential effects on the development of the foot over time. [10] The emerging findings from the same research team [11] support the need for progress in children’s footwear science and advance understanding of the interaction between the foot and shoe in order to improve our care and understanding of children’s feet.

Also presented for the readership are advances in our understanding of the biomechanical considerations of footwear related to foot motion. [12] These insights into foot and ankle biomechanics will become even more essential as we investigate and treat complex diseases. Further, in relation to footwear design, research demonstrates that particular design features are beneficial in managing specific conditions, for example rockers soles for people with diabetes [13] and neoprene uppers reduce discomfort in the toe area. [14]

However, not only is it important to ensure the design of footwear is correct but that people are supported in choosing the most appropriate footwear. Guidelines can inform practitioners on what needs to be considered [15] and clinical tools aid the level of understanding that the clinician needs in order to support the patient in their footwear choices. [4]

In conclusion, the intention of this special theme issue is to spark intellectual curiosity, and generate interest in the importance of footwear, which will lead to new insights, better understanding and ultimately improved foot health for people throughout their lives.

Source Special theme article: science and sociology of footwear, Anita Ellen Williams. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2018 11:52. Published 14 September 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-018-0293-y

  References
  1. Incorrectly fitted footwear, foot pain and foot disorders: a systematic search and narrative review of the literature, Buldt AK, Menz HB. J Foot Ankle Res. 2018 Jul 28;11:43. doi: 10.1186/s13047-018-0284-z. eCollection 2018. Review.
  2. Footwear choices for painful feet – an observational study exploring footwear and foot problems in women, McRitchie M, Branthwaite H, Chockalingam N. J Foot Ankle Res. 2018 May 31;11:23. doi: 10.1186/s13047-018-0265-2. eCollection 2018.
  3. Independent factors associated with wearing different types of outdoor footwear in a representative inpatient population: a cross-sectional study, Barwick AL, van Netten JJ, Reed LF, Lazzarini PA. J Foot Ankle Res. 2018 May 29;11:19. doi: 10.1186/s13047-018-0260-7. eCollection 2018.
  4. ‘A good fit?’ Bringing the sociology of footwear to the clinical encounter in podiatry services: a narrative review, Nicholls E, Robinson V, Farndon L, Vernon W. J Foot Ankle Res. 2018;11:9. Published online 2018 Mar 20. doi: 10.1186/s13047-018-0253-6. eCollection 2018. Review.
  5. Footwear characteristics in people with inflammatory arthritis in Singapore, Carter K, Lahiri M, Cheung PP, Santosa A, Rome K. J Foot Ankle Res. 2016;9:29. Published online 2016 Aug 17. doi: 10.1186/s13047-016-0161-6. eCollection 2016.
  6. Characteristics of footwear worn by people with systemic lupus erythematosus: a comparison with age- and sex-matched healthy controls: a pilot study, Stewart S, Keys M, Brenton-Rule A, Aiyer A, Dalbeth N, Rome K. J Foot Ankle Res. 2018 Jul 5;11:38. doi: 10.1186/s13047-018-0280-3. eCollection 2018.
  7. Diabetic Foot Australia guideline on footwear for people with diabetes, van Netten JJ, Lazzarini PA, Armstrong DG, Bus SA, Fitridge R, Harding K, Kinnear E, Malone M, Menz HB, Perrin BM, Postema K, Prentice J, Schott KH, Wraight PR. J Foot Ankle Res. 2018 Jan 15;11:2. doi: 10.1186/s13047-017-0244-z. eCollection 2018.
  8. A survey exploring self-reported indoor and outdoor footwear habits, foot problems and fall status in people with stroke and Parkinson’s, Bowen C, Ashburn A, Cole M, Donovan-Hall M, Burnett M, Robison J, Mamode L, Pickering R, Bader D, Kunkel D. J Foot Ankle Res. 2016 Sep 22;9:39. doi: 10.1186/s13047-016-0170-5. eCollection 2016.
  9. An explorative qualitative study to determine the footwear needs of workers in standing environments, Anderson J, Williams AE, Nester C. J Foot Ankle Res. 2017 Aug 30;10:41. doi: 10.1186/s13047-017-0223-4. eCollection 2017.
  10. Development of the infant foot as a load bearing structure: study protocol for a longitudinal evaluation (the Small Steps study), Price C, McClymont J, Hashmi F, Morrison SC, Nester C. J Foot Ankle Res. 2018 Jun 20;11:33. doi: 10.1186/s13047-018-0273-2. eCollection 2018.
  11. Big issues for small feet: developmental, biomechanical and clinical narratives on children’s footwear, Morrison SC, Price C, McClymont J, Nester C. J Foot Ankle Res. 2018 Jul 6;11:39. doi: 10.1186/s13047-018-0281-2. eCollection 2018. Review.
  12. The feasibility of a modified shoe for multi-segment foot motion analysis: a preliminary study, Halstead J, Keenan AM, Chapman GJ, Redmond AC. J Foot Ankle Res. 2016 Feb 24;9:7. doi: 10.1186/s13047-016-0138-5. eCollection 2016.
  13. Optimisation of rocker sole footwear for prevention of first plantar ulcer: comparison of group-optimised and individually-selected footwear designs, Preece SJ, Chapman JD, Braunstein B, Brüggemann GP, Nester CJ. J Foot Ankle Res. 2017 Jul 6;10:27. doi: 10.1186/s13047-017-0208-3. eCollection 2017.
  14. Medical-grade footwear: the impact of fit and comfort, Hurst B, Branthwaite H, Greenhalgh A, Chockalingam N. J Foot Ankle Res. 2017 Jan 5;10:2. doi: 10.1186/s13047-016-0184-z. eCollection 2017.
  15. If the shoe fits: development of an on-line tool to aid practitioner/patient discussions about ‘healthy footwear’, Farndon L, Robinson V, Nicholls E, Vernon W. J Foot Ankle Res. 2016 Jun 7;9:17. doi: 10.1186/s13047-016-0149-2. eCollection 2016.

Source Journal of Foot and Ankle Research

Also see
Thematic series: The Science and Sociology of Footwear in The Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
Incorrectly fitted footwear, foot pain and foot disorders in Lower Extremity Review

MOBILITY MENU
   403-240-9100
Call 403-240-9100